|
|
Post by Jameson on Apr 21, 2005 14:17:39 GMT -5
and to be honest, enchantments still suck ass.
that's why shaman is better than zealot and will be for long time.
|
|
|
|
Post by ExaltedShadowmage on Apr 21, 2005 15:19:01 GMT -5
kind of yeah
although i have to admit that the Honden deck is pretty sweet
anywho, i think that for now you are right
in a more encompassing format like Extended though, i would argue that the Zealot is way better not only because it can hit enchantments, but because it can do so at instant speed
|
|
|
|
Post by realmlord on Apr 21, 2005 15:25:13 GMT -5
With Genjus running around, and Hondens, and Worship, and Glorious Anthem, and Heartbeat of Spring.....No Enchantments don't such anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by ExaltedShadowmage on Apr 21, 2005 15:44:25 GMT -5
d**n JAMESON YOU GOT SERVED
time to go run naked around the soccer field..........
oh sorry, thats a really inside joke
|
|
|
|
Post by Jameson on Apr 21, 2005 17:53:18 GMT -5
yeah they really do. none of those is problematic enough to warrant zealot being better and they're not numerous enough to warrant zealot inclusion... bottom line being zealot costs a mana more, is three times as mana intensive, loses a point of toughness, and has a small amount of flexibility over shaman.
shaman is STILL the better card, regardless of Worship, Anthem, and friends.
|
|
|
|
Post by ExaltedShadowmage on Apr 21, 2005 20:46:44 GMT -5
maybe.
the real truth is that Zealot is the better card, but shaman will be more used just, and i mean just, because he is a little more splashable
|
|
